Skip to content

Spec + AI crawler reference

llms.txt Explained: The Complete Guide + Free Generator

llms.txt is a proposed plain-text file, published at your site's root, that gives AI systems a concise, structured summary of what your site is and where its key pages live. This guide covers the exact specification, a full reference table of every major AI crawler (not just the three most people check), and a free generator at the bottom of this page.

The llms.txt specification, exactly

llms.txt (see the proposal at llmstxt.org) is a Markdown file served at /llms.txt. The format is simple and specific:

  1. An optional byte-order mark.
  2. An H1 heading, the only required section. This is your site or project name, written as a single Markdown H1 line (# Your Site Name).
  3. An optional blockquote directly after the H1: a one-line summary of what the site is.
  4. Optional free-text body content.
  5. Optional H2 sections, each containing a bullet list of Markdown links in the form - [page title](url): short note, grouping your key pages (docs, pricing, API reference, etc).

That's the entire spec. It's intentionally minimal: the H1 is the only hard requirement, everything else is there to help an AI system navigate your site faster than parsing full HTML. Our AI Visibility Checker checks for exactly this: does the file exist, and does it start with a valid H1.

Full reference: every AI crawler this tool checks

Most llms.txt and AI-crawler guides list three bots. Here are all 16 this tool checks, individually, against your robots.txt file, with what each one is used for and whether it's documented to respect a Disallow rule.

Bot Company Purpose Respects robots.txt Source
GPTBot OpenAI Träningsdata för framtida GPT-modeller Not checked developers.openai.com/api/docs/bots
OAI-SearchBot OpenAI Indexering för ChatGPT-sökresultat Not checked developers.openai.com/api/docs/bots
ChatGPT-User OpenAI Live-hämtning när en ChatGPT-användare klickar en citering Not checked developers.openai.com/api/docs/bots
ClaudeBot Anthropic Träningsdata för Claude-modeller Not checked Anthropic support-dokumentation (branschtäckning, ej förstapartsfetchad denna runda)
Claude-User Anthropic Live-hämtning när en Claude-användare ställer en fråga Not checked Anthropic support-dokumentation
Claude-SearchBot Anthropic Indexering för sökresultatkvalitet Not checked Anthropic support-dokumentation
PerplexityBot Perplexity Indexering Not checked docs.perplexity.ai/guides/bots
Perplexity-User Perplexity Live-agent-hämtning på användarens uppdrag Not checked Omtvistat: Perplexity hävdar att detta är en agent, inte en bot, och därför inte robots.txt-bunden (community-/förlagsrapportering, ej entydigt bekräftat av Perplexity själva)
Google-Extended Google AI-träningstoken för Gemini/Vertex AI (separat från sökindexering) Not checked Google Search Central (branschtäckning av tokenlistan, ej förstapartsfetchad denna runda)
Applebot-Extended Apple AI-träningstoken för Apple Intelligence (samma mekanism som Google-Extended) Not checked Apple support (branschtäckning)
Bytespider ByteDance (TikTok) Träningsdata Not checked Ofta ignorerad i praktiken enligt flera oberoende källor; Disallow bör ändå respekteras när den faktiskt läses
CCBot Common Crawl (ideell) Öppen webbdatabas: grunden för många öppen-källkod-LLM:ars träningsdata Not checked commoncrawl.org/ccbot
Meta-ExternalAgent Meta Träningsdata för Meta AI/Llama (ersätter gamla FacebookBot/MetaAIBot-namnen) Not checked Meta for Developers (branschtäckning)
Meta-ExternalFetcher Meta Användarinitierad hämtning (Meta AI-assistenten) Not checked Nyare token, mindre dokumenterad; verifiera igen vid nästa granskning
Amazonbot Amazon Alexa/Kindle/Amazon Shopping-produktförbättring Not checked developer.amazon.com/amazonbot
DuckAssistBot DuckDuckGo AI-assistent-svar Not checked Lägre källdjup denna runda; verifiera mot DuckDuckGos egen dokumentation vid nästa granskning

Bot database last verified 2026-08-25 · Sammanställning: OpenAI/Anthropic/Perplexity/Google officiell dokumentation + branschreferenser (se per-bot source)

The robots.txt block to allow all of them

If you want to explicitly allow every AI crawler in the table above, add this to your robots.txt (adjust if you want to keep specific ones out, for example if you don't want your content used for a particular company's model training):

User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /

User-agent: OAI-SearchBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: Claude-User
Allow: /

User-agent: Claude-SearchBot
Allow: /

User-agent: PerplexityBot
Allow: /

User-agent: Google-Extended
Allow: /

User-agent: Applebot-Extended
Allow: /

User-agent: CCBot
Allow: /

User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent
Allow: /

User-agent: Amazonbot
Allow: /

Run the AI Visibility Checker afterward to confirm the change took effect and see which, if any, bots are still blocked by a broader wildcard rule elsewhere in your file.

GPTBot and OpenAI's crawlers specifically

Because it's the single most-searched AI crawler by name, a quick note on GPTBot specifically: it's OpenAI's crawler for gathering training data for future GPT models, separate from OAI-SearchBot (which indexes pages for ChatGPT's search feature) and ChatGPT-User (which fetches a page live, on demand, when a ChatGPT user clicks through a citation). All three are documented by OpenAI to respect robots.txt, and all three can be allowed or blocked independently, since they're separate user-agent strings, not one combined bot. See OpenAI's own documentation for the current, authoritative list.

For the broader technical foundation these crawlers depend on (indexability, schema, sitemap), see our GEO guide, or check your own site directly on the homepage.

Generate your own llms.txt

Fill in your site name and a one-line summary below to generate a spec-valid llms.txt file you can copy and publish at your site root.

Common llms.txt mistakes

The most common mistake is publishing the file without the required H1 line, for example starting directly with a blockquote or a paragraph. Per the spec, the H1 is the only mandatory section, and a file missing it is treated as invalid by this checker (a yellow, not red, signal, since the file at least exists). Other frequent issues: linking to pages that return a 404, listing so many links that the file loses its 'concise summary' purpose, and forgetting to update it after a major site restructure, since nothing will automatically flag a stale llms.txt the way a broken sitemap link sometimes does.

Frequently asked questions

Is llms.txt a real, official web standard?
Not yet an official standard ratified by a body like the IETF or W3C, but a widely discussed community proposal (llmstxt.org) that a growing number of AI-focused tools and sites have adopted. It costs very little to add and doesn't conflict with anything else on your site, which is why we recommend it even before it's universally required.
Where exactly should llms.txt live?
At the root of your domain, for example https://yoursite.com/llms.txt, the same convention used by robots.txt and sitemap.xml.
Do I need both llms.txt and robots.txt?
Yes, they do different jobs. robots.txt controls crawler access (who is allowed to fetch what). llms.txt is a content summary for AI systems that can already access your site. One doesn't replace the other.
Which AI crawlers should I never block?
That depends on your goals, but if AI visibility matters to you, GPTBot, ChatGPT-User, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, Claude-User and PerplexityBot are the highest-value bots to keep allowed, since they power the most widely used AI assistants and AI-powered search products.
What's the difference between GPTBot and Google-Extended?
GPTBot is OpenAI's crawler. Google-Extended is not a separate crawler with its own user-agent in your server logs; it's a robots.txt token that lets you opt your content out of being used for Gemini and Vertex AI training specifically, while still allowing normal Googlebot search indexing.
Does adding llms.txt guarantee AI systems will cite my site?
No. It makes your site easier and faster for an AI system to parse and summarize accurately, which improves the odds, but no technical file can guarantee a citation. That decision is made by the AI system itself.

Check whether these crawlers can actually reach your site

This reference table is static. Run the live checker to test your own domain.

Run the AI Visibility Checker

Free. No sign-up.